Million dollar flops 20 Feb 2014

http://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-qld-bundall-116182291

I'm not sure if it was the lighting or the colour of the class, but the smudged brown look on the wall inside the show is a turn off for me. One of the rooms, because of the photo angle appears to be no larger than a shoebox.

http://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-qld-ashmore-116180731

The whole concept of showing a bed in this room kind of reminds me of 2 broke girls, where one of them is forced to install a bed in the lounge room. I'm not quite sure that was the way to go for a million dollar home.

http://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-qld-helensvale-116180491
http://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-qld-helensvale-116179571

I've included these two simply because it's different agents selling the same house. How you frame photos makes a difference!

http://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-qld-mermaid+beach-116170867

The decor and fussy picture really annoys me. It's a million dollar home. I would remove all the odds and ends before taking photos. This would be the top flop of the week for me. If I zoomed in enough, I might be able to see confidential information on the desk. Who on earth wants to see rubbish in a real estate ad?

http://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-qld-sovereign+islands-116177863

Why are there no internal pictures? I'm not going all the way out there to find that it's a hole inside. Do they even have permission to sell? Or is an exwife trying to sell without the ex husband's permission. Just joking.

http://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-qld-parkwood-116168559

Odd pictures of road? And tonnes of random pictures. Why would you take a picture of a million dollar property wire fence? And I suspect that the internal photos were taken on a camera phone, they are so blurry it makes me wonder whether it's me or my glasses.